- From: Mitake Holloman Burts <mitake.97@alum.dartmouth.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:12:27 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Ok, I know this isn't a particularly complex or pretty website, but I wanted to have something a bit more concrete to talk about. I've included the URL for a website I did for a commercial customer. They wanted some images on the page for "visual interest." They consider their main target audience to be construction contractors and people planning special outdoor events that need to rent their items. I know that some of the text on the pages is not particularly clear due to the client's wish to stick to some euphemistic jargon particular to their industry. http://www.readilite-barricade.com/ My question is: are the images on the pages likely to provide enough of a graphical alternative for a non-reader to be able to identify if this page is worth their interest? I'm trying to understand what level of information needs to be presented. Is it enough to show associated products or images? is it a matter of determining if the page is worth the bother of trying to understand what it says? what are we trying to say the implications are for a small company that wants to establish it's presence on the web? what is enough graphics? Thanks, Mitake Holloman Burts Raleigh, NC
Received on Friday, 18 June 1999 14:11:27 UTC