- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 10:01:41 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Could someone from the "illiterate/non-cognitive" camp please post an example of how you would make the front page of the W3C site accessible to non-readers? It would help a _lot_. I find that when I am teaching accessibility classes, people will not understand something unless they have an example. Bobby helps tremendously in this regard, to illustrate -- visually, even! -- what's wrong with a given page. (The current Bobby incarnation is less than optimal, however, as it gives solid little blue hats for things that are very good things, chiefly accessibility features not understood by common browsers...but that's another issue.) I can point at a web page and say "this part can't be used by a blind person." I can turn off images and show the big fat [IMAGE] where content should be. I can give examples of how to correct it, and come back later and say, "see, it's fixed now!" I would really like it if those advocating this form of "accessibility" (which I would argue, as several others have done, is of a different shade entirely) could provide concrete examples how to adapt an existing site -- the W3C's, since that has been publically challenged here -- to meet the needs of this group of users we're talking about. If there's no way to explain that to _me_, then your cause is likely a lost one. I'm all _for_ compassion and helping these people, but you need to lay it out for me what's wrong with current sites and explain how to fix it, if you're going to be making accusations of inaccessibility. That goes for _any_ claims of inaccessibility, by the way. -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com> http://www.kynn.com/ Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet http://www.idyllmtn.com/ Become AWARE of Web Accessibility! http://aware.hwg.org/ Selfish Reasons For An Accessible Website http://www.kynn.com/+selfish
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 1999 13:30:46 UTC