- From: David Bolnick <davebo@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 18:15:26 -0700
- To: "'Kynn Bartlett'" <kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com>, poehlman@clark.net
- Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
As long as you remember that deaf-blind and certain other conditions require the alt text as text to read. David. ______________________________ David A. Bolnick, Ph.D. Accessibility Program Manager: Multimedia, Telecommunications Producer: Microsoft Enable Productions (http://microsoft.com/enable/productions/) Microsoft Corporation, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052 E-mail: davebo@microsoft.com Web: http://microsoft.com/enable -----Original Message----- From: Kynn Bartlett [mailto:kynn-hwg@idyllmtn.com] Sent: Sunday, May 16, 1999 12:36 PM To: poehlman@clark.net Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: wave file as alt tag? David wrote: > Suppose you could capture the sound of an image say a bullet or a > picture of a tea kettle and put that sound in a wave file? Suppose > further that you could then identify that sound once and then let it > stand for its self due to its uniqueness? would it be appropriate to > use it as an alt tag considering that some actually many people will > not hear it but for those who can process and hear it, it would render > well and uniquely? You could use CSS to make this an aural icon or use OBJECT to make it an aural "alt" text. --Kynn
Received on Sunday, 16 May 1999 21:15:40 UTC