- From: <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 09:33:05 -0500
- To: webwatch@telelists.com, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Steve wrote: >The existence of such newer technologies is not the only issue. The other equally important >question is how many people actually own/use the newer technologies. I would hope that >access to information will not become dependent upon having the latest technologies. Even if >*all* of the most recent versions of user agents have a specific feature allowing access to >specific elements of a web page, the overall principle of ensuring access to those of us who >might not have the newer technologies cannot be over emphasized. The WAI thus far has >reflected this in the guidelines and I trust will continue to do so. I am not - repeat - not advocating for accessibility to be dependent on the "latest technologies". I am advocating for accessibility to be dependent on *available* technologies. Hence my question asking for data or configurations where access to word-wrapped columns is still a problem. My definition of the word "available" includes" on the hardware platform currently in use" - so as not to incur the cost of upgrading the hardware. My definition of available also includes, it *is* available if I just need to upgrade freely to the next version of the software. Again, please send me hardware, operating system, browser, and/or assistive technology configurations where access to word-wrapped columns of text is still a problem. Regards, Phill Jenkins
Received on Thursday, 22 April 1999 10:36:27 UTC