Re: Checklist

William,

Actually if you look at the draft which Wendy Chisholm mentions in her
message
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/1998OctDec/0517.html> you
will notice there are now two draft checklists (of "checkpoints") available
for review, for just this reason.

More background on these checklist changes & a formal call for review on
the new version of the Page Author Guidelines will be coming within the
next several days. They have been held up due to some server problems here
over the holidays, which has delayed some technical corrections in the
documents needing review.

Judy

At 06:18 AM 12/31/98 -0800, William Loughborough wrote:
>When the Guidelines were first started (it only seems like a decade
>ago!) the intent was for there to be the large "reference" document and
>a "checklist" that was either abstracted from the GL or created
>separately.  This hasn't received a lot of emphasis and perhaps now is
>the time to undertake this - possibly in conjunction with the quicktips
>card that Education & Outreach is printing.  
>
>As a first stab, perhaps the table of contents itself can be the basis
>for the checklist.  It is important that this sort of terseness is
>maintained so as not to have too daunting a checklist.
>-- 
>Love.
>            ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
>http://dicomp.pair.com
>
----------
Judy Brewer    jbrewer@w3.org    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA

Received on Thursday, 31 December 1998 09:48:28 UTC