- From: Jamal Mazrui <empower@smart.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 08:59:46 +0400
- To: <rcn@fenix2.dol-esa.gov>
- CC: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I'm fairly sure Kelly Pierce is using Lynx 2.8. I also thought it supported SSL connections, but when my ISP (Smartnet) upgraded to this version, I discovered SSL support is lacking. Perhaps there is some configuration setting to turn it on -- if so, I'd like to know about it. Regards, Jamal On 1998-11-23 rcn@fenix2.dol-esa.gov said: NI cannot remember what the individual was using to access the NChicago site. However, I believe Lynx 2.8 is SSL compliant (AL, can Nanswer that one - despite the fact that I have already asked him Nand forgot). PwWebSpeak is working on a SSL compliant version. NCant answer for JFW or WinVision, can anyone else? NSSL is more secure than an open line and it offers better security Nthan when I give my card to the waiter who disappears into another Nroom. SSL provides browser to server security. If someone breaks Nthis, then they are more than a novice hacker. NI'd be more concerned as to how the CTA is maintaining the data and Nservers. But that is getting off the subject. NSSL is good and the browser manufactures need to hurry and be Ncomplaint. I can't believe that their business development teams Nmissed this product discriminator. Nrob Net-Tamer V 1.11.1 - Registered
Received on Tuesday, 24 November 1998 08:00:20 UTC