- From: rcn <rcn@fenix2.dol-esa.gov>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 08:04:18 -0500
- To: "Charles F. Munat" <coder@acnet.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Charles, my compliments to the simplicity of the site and your willingness to let us critique. Here are my comments using pwWebSpeak.. 1. When I read your site using pwWebSpeak, I did not see this title. <link href="nosearch/pwweb.html" rel="alternate" title="Visitors using p w Webspeak or other self voicing browsers, please select this link for special information. . ." media="aural, braille, tty"> 2. When I select the image link I go to the description page, but the back link on this page does not take me back to the original page. 3. This is the first page I have seen where the title tag is not printed. Its read... 4. I find the hidden link to be a distraction ~rob -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Charles F. Munat Sent: Saturday, October 24, 1998 11:31 PM To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Subject: Two new sites << File: UTF-8.HTM >> I have recently completed (or nearly so) two sites that I've tried to make as accessible as possible while retaining a pleasing, commercially viable look. (My clients didn't give a damn about accessibility. I shoved it down their throats, doing the work on my own time. One's response was "I haven't sold anything to a blind man yet," and you know what? I bet he never does.) Anyway, being a person with reasonably good eyesight (corrected to almost 20/20 anyway), I obviously have all sorts of biases, most of which are probably subconscious. Although I've spent a good amount of time with pwWebspeak listening to the sites (and trying to navigate it with my eyes closed), I just know I've missed things. So, I would appreciate any help that the members of this list can provide. Those willing to take a look (how visually biased our language is), should point their browsers to the links below: The first site is artistically more interesting (well, I like it better), but uses tables for formatting and a few invisible spacer images. Just wouldn't work without them, and my client is still using Netscape 2! Still, it sounds okay to me. You can find it at Vallarta Unveiled: http://vallartabooks.com. Note for users of IE4, access keys are enabled. For a list of access keys for any page, hit Alt (Cmd) k. Also, all photos link to image descriptions. With the idea in mind that people who can see the page might go to these pages, I made them as visually appealing as the rest of the site. The second site is less interesting (it's a real estate site... bores me to tears), but it provides both image and text only versions. The text only version is validated to HTML 4.0 (strict) and uses cascading style sheets for formatting. It's a very simple looking site. The site is Tropicasa Realty: http://tropicasa.com. Access keys enabled here, too. Same story, Alt + K brings up a list. Both sites should validate to HTML 4.0 and CSS1. They make extensive use of style sheets. And both validated on Bobby (all pages), though I've made a couple of changes and have to recheck. I would appreciate any feedback, criticism, comment, whatever that anyone has to offer. Thanks in advance. Charles F. Munat Code Red Internet Solutions Puerto Vallarta, Mexico coder@acnet.net 011-52-322-31094
Received on Monday, 26 October 1998 08:03:59 UTC