- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 22:10:36 -0500 (EST)
- To: hakkinen@dev.prodworks.com (Markku T. Hakkinen)
- Cc: coder@acnet.net, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
In an ideal world, the preferences governing what acronyms and abbreviations get pronounced (e.g. WAI) and which get pronounced as the full-word expansion associated with them would be part of _the user's personal dictionary extensions_ and not a stylesheet or HTML structure generated by the source site author. This would seem to be more a function of the specific abbreviation and listener than of the document context in which it is used. FWIW Al to follow up on what Markku T. Hakkinen said: > From w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org Sun Oct 25 13:39:58 1998 > Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 13:34:49 -0500 (EST) > Resent-Message-Id: <199810251834.NAA24457@www19.w3.org> > From: "Markku T. Hakkinen" <hakkinen@dev.prodworks.com> > To: "Charles F. Munat" <coder@acnet.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> > Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 13:33:24 -0500 > Message-ID: <000101be0045$f32b57c0$5b3f2581@nisc.jvnc.net> > X-Priority: 3 (Normal) > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26 > In-Reply-To: <012401be0040$ac0a0f80$3c1172a7@acnet.net> > Importance: Normal > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 > Subject: RE: Two new sites > Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > X-Mailing-List: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> archive/latest/1698 > X-Loop: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Sender: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org > Resent-Sender: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org > Precedence: list [Charset utf-8 unsupported, skipping...]
Received on Sunday, 25 October 1998 22:10:45 UTC