- From: Charles (Chuck) Oppermann <chuckop@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 18:04:44 -0700
- To: "'John T. Whelan'" <whelan@physics.utah.edu>, colin@nospam.demon.co.uk, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
<< I agree that the use of ALT as tooltips regardless of the TITLE tag hurts the web coming and going by 1) making sensible ALT text look stupid as a tooltip and 2) causing people to define tooltip-oriented ALT text which makes no sense in a text browser, like ALT="BULLET". But wouldn't a sensible strategy be: >> Before IE3 started using ALT tags as ToolTips, very, very few web sites bothered with putting ALT text in. Most books just referenced ALT as needed for "text-mode browsers" and wasn't a concern for graphical browsers. Additionally, authors who wanted to put in ALT text didn't have a way of easily testing their implementation. All throughout graphical user interfaces, ToolTips are used to provide textual representations of graphical objects. Sure some people will abuse ALT, but it's likely that those relatively small number of people who do so, wouldn't have bothered with an ALT if the ToolTip feature didn't exist. Finally, nearly 100% of the time, some ALT text is better than no ALT text. The abuse of ALT was rectified in HTML 4.0 by the addition of TITLE. Now authors can provide alternative text and user interface hints. Please see my comments in the Page Authoring Guidelines list for a description of how Internet Explorer treats ALT and TITLE. Charles Oppermann Program Manager, Active Accessibility, Microsoft Corporation mailto:chuckop@microsoft.com http://microsoft.com/enable/ "A computer on every desk and in every home, usable by everyone!"
Received on Tuesday, 18 August 1998 21:04:29 UTC