- From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Aug 1998 14:43:03 -0400 (EDT)
- To: webwatch-l@teleport.com
- cc: basr-l@trace.wisc.edu, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
it would have been nice had they used alt tags in their images. On Sun, 9 Aug 1998, Patrick Burke wrote: > <fontfamily><param>Times New Roman</param><bigger>Apologies for > cross-posting. > > > http://www.webstandards.org > > > They are scheduled to launche officially tomorrow. An article describing > their goals, focusing on uniform browser implementation of CSS & other > standards is available at: > > > http://www.thestandard.net/articles/news_display/0,1270,1325,00.html > > > Patrick > > > Here is the text of the article: > > > August 06, 1998 > > Web Designers Protest Microsoft and Netscape > > Standards Rift > > > By Alex Lash > > > A group of high–profile Web designers is forming a > > coalition to protest the differing standards between > > Microsoft's and Netscape's browsers. > > > "We're in danger of getting to the point where the > > Web is made of fragments, with one browser > > supporting one fragment and the other browser > > supporting another, and with no middle ground," > > says Glenn Davis, spokesman for the Web > > Standards Project. > > > WSP members hope that grassroots developer > > pressure will influence Microsoft and Netscape as > > the companies work on their fifth–generation > > browsers. In the past, both companies have added > > nonstandard technologies without waiting for > > approval from the Web standards overseer, the > > World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Sometimes > > that approval never materializes, as with > > Netscape's HTML "layer tag," or Microsoft's > > Windows–only Active X. > > > However, Davis says that between the companies' > > 4.0 browsers, Microsoft Internet Explorer is closer > > to full support of most Web standards, while > > Netscape's lack of support for the cascading > > stylesheets standard, which enables designers to > > display and rearrange information dynamically > > within the browser, is a major concern. > > > The debate over diverging browser standards has > > in part been sparked by Microsoft's decision to > > merge its browser into the dominant Windows > > operating system. By developing sites for Internet > > Explorer, Web designers know that millions of > > Windows users will be assured of accessing > > those sites. But Netscape's Navigator remains the > > more popular browser by a slim margin, and > > developers are hesitant to throw their lot into only > > one camp, thus inflating the cost of Web > > development. > > > Davis, who runs Web–design firm Project Cool > > (www.projectcool.com), estimates it costs 25 > > percent more to develop a cutting–edge site that > > can be fully accessed by both browsers. > > > Microsoft product manager Mike Nichols said the > > company is committed to leading support in all > > industry standards and technologies and will > > continue to do so with IE 5.0. Netscape was not > > immediately available for comment. > > > Microsoft has released a developer–only beta of IE > > 5.0, while Netscape is counting on its decision to > > free its browser source code to spur innovation for > > Navigator 5.0. > > > The Web Standards Project is also concerned > > with future browsers that will run on non–PC > > devices, such as palmtops and Web phones. > > "Lack of standards support is going to hurt that > > development," said Davis. > > > Other members of the Web Standards Project > > include Martin Diekhoff of the Getty Information > > Institute(www.gii.getty.edu), Ann Navarro of Webgeek > Communications > > (www.webgeek.com), Roger Black of Interactive Bureau (www.iab.com), > and > > John Shiple of Squishy Designs (www.squishy.com). The group's Web > site > > (www.webstandards.org) will be live on Monday. > > > > Copyright © 1998 The Industry Standard | All rights reserved | > Webmaster </bigger></fontfamily> > > > > > Patrick J. Burke > > burke@ucla.edu > > http://www.dcp.ucla.edu/patrick > > > University of California > > Los Angeles > > Disabilities & Computing Program > > > Analyzing Usability > > Since 1994 >
Received on Sunday, 9 August 1998 14:42:44 UTC