RE: My comments on tables vs image maps

I agree on all points except one, i.e., (3).
If we stick to the topic of image maps. 

 
> 3. The argument is that most (or all?) versions of Netscape 
> and Explorer cannot be configured to 'Text' mode. 
> They present "alt" text is a small size font, even if it 
> is H1.
 
In an image map, we don't need headers <H1>, or do we? Image maps are nothing but navigation means via points.

 
> Also in graphical media with no mouse (e.g. tv ) 
> image maps constitute a very serious usability 
> problem. 


Well if the link of the image map cannot be reach, I suppose that the normal links cannot be reached either.

Shurel.

Received on Friday, 31 July 1998 03:57:56 UTC