- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 05:48:42 -0800
- To: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I hope that as an "interest group" we keep sight of what it is we're interested in - full accessibility for people with disabilities - as well as everybody being connected to everything. The importance of what we are trying to do is often underscored by certain eloquences from the Disability Rights Movement to which end I quote from a leader in the field, Justin Dart: "Too many potentially productive citizens are condemned to permanent poverty in institutions, backrooms, and prisons of obsolete perception - at enormous expense to our society. This is an unconscionable waste of money and humanity." The "prisons of obsolete perception" are the cyber-Bastilles whose walls must come tumbling down and a *MAJOR* tool is going to be CSS2. When we were told at the face2face that its inclusion in "major" browsers was somewhat problematic ("you must realize that this is no easy task") it was a severe disappointment. Efforts to hurry and include an essentially "rogue" non-standard browser-specific "feature" like LAYER or the notorious BLINK and MARQUEE features were OK to rush into use but CSS2, the most likely candidate for effective isolation of content from presentation is seen as "trouble" for a beleaguered programming staff. There is a pejorative term in our language: "blind rage" and it is what one feels when confronted with the attitudes that confine deaf people in institutions for forty years because somebody diagnosed them as severely retarded. A similar emotion surfaces in those of us faced with the notion that point-and-click should be acceptable with no alternative usable by people without use of hands or retinae. "Poor unfortunate blind people just won't be able to use computers." This is unacceptable. Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Thursday, 26 March 1998 08:51:44 UTC