- From: Waddell, Cynthia <cynthia.waddell@ci.sj.ca.us>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 17:18:50 -0800
- To: "'W3C interest group'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
As requested, I am reposting my January 6, 1998 e-mail concerning the Policy Ruling by the US Department of Justice requiring both government and businesses to make their web sites accessible. Cynthia D. Waddell ADA Coordinator > ---------- > From: Waddell, Cynthia[:] > Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 1998 11:05 AM > To: whersh > Subject: US DOJ Ruling re Accessible Web Sites > Importance: High > > As you requested, I am forwarding the US Department of Justice Policy > Ruling > requiring both government and businesses to make their web sites > accessible. > > Cynthia D. Waddell > ADA Coordinator > City of San Jose > 801 North First Street, Room 460 > San Jose, CA 95110-1704 > (408) 277-4034 > (408) 971-0134 TTY > (408) 277-3885 FAX > _________________________________________ > Posted in the National Disability Law Reporter, Vol. 10, Iss. 6, par. 240 > September 11, 1997 1053-1084/97 > > The Honorable Tom Harkin > United States Senate > Washington, DC 20510-1502 > > Digest of Inquiry > (July 31, 1996) > > To what extent does the ADA require that Internet web pages be accessible > to people with visual disabilities? > > Digest of Response > (September 9, 1996) > > ADA Accessibility Requirements Apply to Internet Web Pages > > Entities to Title II or III of the ADA must provide effective > communication > to individuals with disabilities, and covered entities that use the > Internet to provide information regarding their programs, goods or > services > must be prepared to offer those communications through accessible means. > Such entities may provide web page information in text format that is > accessible to screen reading devices that are used by people with visual > impairments, and they may also offer alternative accessible formats that > are identified in a screen-readable format on a web page. > > ----- > > Text of Inquiry > > I have recently been contacted by one of my constituents who has a concern > over the administration's policy on making Web pages compatible for the > disabled. I respectfully ask you to review the administration's policy on > this issue and send me a clarification so that I might be able to respond > to my constituent's questions. It would be helpful if you could mark your > correspondence with my office to the attention of Laura Stuber. > > Thank you in advance for your assistance on this matter. > > Text of Response > > I am responding to your letter on behalf of your constituent, [], > regarding accessibility of "web pages" on the Internet to people with > visual disabilities. > > The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires State and local > governments and places of public accommodation to furnish appropriate > auxiliary aids and services where necessary to ensure effect communication > with individuals with disabilities, unless doing so would result in a > fundamental alteration to the program or service or in an undue burden. > 28 > C.F.R. Sec. 36.303; 28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.160. Auxiliary aids include taped > texts, Brailled materials, large print materials, and other methods of > making visually delivered material available to people with visual > impairments. > > Covered entities under the ADA are required to provide effective > communication, regardless of whether they generally communicate through > print media, audio media, or computerized media such as the Internet. > Covered entities that use the Internet for communications regarding their > programs, goods, or services must be prepared to offer those > communications > through accessible means as well. > > Mr. [] suggests compatibility with the Lynx browser as a means of assuring > accessibility of the Internet. Lynx is, however, only one of many > available options. Other examples include providing the web page > information in text format, rather then exclusively in graphic format. > Such text is accessible to screen reading devices used by people with > visual impairments. Instead of providing full accessibility through the > Internet directly, covered entities may also offer other alternate > accessible formats, such as Braille, large print, and/or audio materials, > to communicate the information contained in web pages to people with > visual > impairments. The availability of such materials should be noted in a text > (i.e., screen-readable) format on the web page, along with instructions > for > obtaining the materials, so that people with disabilities using the > Internet will know how to obtain the accessible formats. > > cc: Records, Chrono, Wodtach, McDowdeny, Hill, FOIA > n: > udd > hille > policylt > harkin.ltr > sc. young-parran > > The Internet is an excellent source of information and, of course, people > with disabilities should have access to it as effectively as people > without > disabilities. A number of web sites provide information about > accessibility of web pages, including information about new developments > and guidelines for development of accessible web pages. Examples include: > > http://www.gsa.gov/coca/wwwcode.htm > Center for Information Technology Accommodation > General Services Administration > > http://www.trace.wisc.edu/text/guidelns > Trace Center, University of Wisconsin > > http://www.webable.com/index.html > > http://www.psc-cfp.gc.ca/dmd/access/welcomi.htm > > These sites may be useful to you or your constituent in exploring the > accessibility options on the Internet. In addition, the Department of > Justice has established an ADA home page to educate people about their > rights and responsibilities under the ADA and about the Department's > efforts to implement the ADA. The address of the ADA home page is > http://www/usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adahomi.htm. > > I hope this information is helpful to you in responding to your > constituent. > > Deval L. Patrick > Assistant Attorney General > Civil Rights Division >
Received on Thursday, 19 March 1998 20:21:13 UTC