- From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 18:40:26 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Suzan Dolloff <averil@concentric.net>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, charlesn@sunrise.srl.rmit.edu.au
At first when I saw it, I thought perhaps a good idea but then did a doubletake. what would alt="d" mean to me. no, alt should take me someplace or tell me something usefull. a description page is good and is actually used in some instances already. wgbh for instance. On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Suzan Dolloff wrote: > Thanks, Charles. You thoroughly answered my original question. I have some > thoughts now about your following comments (and since you put them in this > list, I'm following suit): > > CM:: > >The neatest way of including a D-link, which I saw at WWW7 presented by > >some ATRC folks from Toronto, was an image of the same height as the one > >being described, of minimal width ( 1 pixel for example ) with ALT="D-link". > > >Where images are not spaced (this can be specified) it would provide > >clean pages for design-oriented authors who are loath to leave little > >"D"s all over their pages, and a neat linking system that could be > >understood by all browsers and folks. > > SD:: > The solution you mention above certainly addresses the aesthetics of having > little Ds all over the place, but it reminds me of other discussions here > about spacer GIFs being used as layout workarounds, and the general > consensus, as I understood it, that this was a "bad thing." > > To me, it seems encountering "D-Link" in the same list as "Home" or "About > Our Company" or "My Favorite Music" would soon become as universally > understood by the people who need it as "Home" is to anyone who wants to > return to the opening page of a web site. For those who take issue with the > extra work involved in including a D-link page for EACH page of a site, I > suggest the descriptive page itself could, in most cases, be one single > page in outline format (like a sitemap) containing descriptions of all > features not readily accessible to disabled users, its use further > annotated by inclusion of its mention in the ALT tag, i.e., ALT="XYZ > Corporation, D Link Home: #1" or something along those lines. > > Example of a description page (the D-link) as I'm envisioning it: > > "Descriptions for D-Links Contained Within XYZ Corporation" > > Home Page: > 1. Title Graphic: The letters X, Y and Z intertwined with one another > (blah, blah, blah) > 2. Links Graphics: rectangular button shapes with raised text. This graphic > used throughout the site. > 3. Photo of Corporate Office: (etcetera...) > > Financial Page: > 1. Line chart representing increased earnings of 30% in the last fiscal > quarter. > 2. Sound file: Three women singing in the style of 1920s recording artists > to trumpet and piano accompaniment, "We're In the Money" (followed by the > lyrics to the song) > > And so on, and so forth. > > As far as I know, browsers will necessarily limit the number of characters > that render in an ALT attribute, so I imagine this will also be true for > LONGDESC when it's widely supported. If this is so, how else could song > lyrics heard in a midi file be made accessible to a deaf person WITHOUT > resorting to a text-only or D-link page? > > Thoughts? > > Ree' Dolloff > mailto:averil@concentric.net > > Hands-On-Technolog(eye)s touching the internet voice: 1-(301) 949-7599 poehlman@clark.net ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman http://www.clark.net/pub/poehlman
Received on Thursday, 23 April 1998 18:41:34 UTC