- From: Kasday, Leonard <kasday@att.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 08:59:23 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
regarding the debate of using the word "item" vs. "bullet". Here are some more arguments in favor of "bullet". First, the word "bullet" can mean "list item" in common parlance. At least, that's how it's used around here. For example, if someone is giving a viewgraph presentation, someone in the audience may ask: "I have a question about that third bullet" The person in the audience is talking about the third list item, of course, not the little black dot. Second, I think it's more useful to use concrete images when a blind and sighted person are communicating. For example, suppose a sighted and blind pereson are each viewing a page which as several headings, several big pictures, and a bullet list. If the blind person says "third bullet" the sighted person will immediately know what the blind person was referring to. But if the blind person says "third item" the sighted person wouldn't know whether the blind person means third heading, image, list item, or what. . In general, in my experience, sighted people tend to have problems thinking abstractly about page content so the more concrete we make it for them the better So that's why it's important for blind folks to know what the sighted folks are seeing so they can appropriately accommodate them. By the way, if you're sighted, please don't take offence. I'm sighted myself. Len
Received on Tuesday, 4 November 1997 08:59:16 UTC