W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-hc@w3.org > October to December 1997

"Ian B. Jacobs": Make summary attribute on TABLE requried? (fwd)

From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 14:51:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199712102251.OAA00882@server.livingston.com>
To: w3c-wai-hc@w3.org
Once upon a time Daniel Dardailler shaped the electrons to say...
>David Abrahamson (ISO) has asked the HTML WG to make
>the "summary" attribute on TABLE required, rather than
>option, obviously in the interest of accessibility.

I don't think this is a really good idea.  Some tables are VERY simple,
only a couple of cells which are self-explanatory.  I think authors would
resent being forced to summarize something obvious.

Summary is useful for large and/or complex tables - any table where
purpose or context is not clear.  But I don't feel it is appropriate for
ALL tables.

And tables WILL continue to be used for layout for quite some time -
especially in form layout.

Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 1997 17:52:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:35:01 UTC