- From: Pawson, David <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:16:01 -0000
- To: WAI HC Working Group <w3c-wai-hc@w3.org>
At http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-XSL.html The XSL input says <quote> The ECMAScript standard provides the basis for the XSL scripting language. ECMAScript is the standardized specification of JavaScript. http://www.ecma.ch details. </quote> From: Dave Pawson. RNIB(UK) e-mail dpawson@rnib.org.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Dardailler [SMTP:danield@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 1997 15:07 > To: WAI HC Working Group > Subject: Re: role of DOM vs. SPEAKROW > > > Jason: > > The main problem with the script approach is that there is no > > universal scripting language currently available and, so far as I > > am aware, none has been or is about to be endorsed by the W3C. > > ECMAScript is achieving some consensus I think, which doesn't equal to > say we should use it at our base if we worked on script, but that's a > potential and maybe likely player.
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 1997 11:12:00 UTC