W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-hc@w3.org > October to December 1997

RE: role of DOM vs. SPEAKROW

From: Pawson, David <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 16:16:01 -0000
Message-ID: <81B329C63AEFD0119929006097AB82E40A3138@priory.rnib.org.uk>
To: WAI HC Working Group <w3c-wai-hc@w3.org>

At http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-XSL.html
The XSL input says
<quote>
The ECMAScript standard provides the basis for the XSL scripting
language. ECMAScript is the standardized
specification of JavaScript.  http://www.ecma.ch details. </quote>

From: Dave Pawson. RNIB(UK)
e-mail dpawson@rnib.org.uk

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Daniel Dardailler [SMTP:danield@w3.org]
> Sent:	Wednesday, November 19, 1997 15:07
> To:	WAI HC Working Group
> Subject:	Re: role of DOM vs. SPEAKROW 
> 
> 
> Jason: 
> > The main problem with the script approach is that there is no
> > universal scripting language currently available and, so far as I
> > am aware, none has been or is about to be endorsed by the W3C.
> 
> ECMAScript is achieving some consensus I think, which doesn't equal to
> say we should use it at our base if we worked on script, but that's a
> potential and maybe likely player.
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 1997 11:12:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:56:12 UTC