- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Nov 1997 09:13:49 -0500 (EST)
- To: w3c-wai-hc@w3.org (HC team)
to follow up on what Jason White said: > My suggestion all along has been: > > media="braille embossed" (for braille embossed on paper) > and > media="braille displayed" for dynamic braille. > The name "braille embossed" is fine. But in terms of the processing model we need to make it clear that the "braille embossed" subtype of the braille base type shares the basic page reference model with the print type. This can be formally described by heredity from a common ancestor class. The braille embossed page and the print page share a common ancestor which defines the common structures of a page context. -- Al
Received on Sunday, 9 November 1997 09:14:07 UTC