- From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 14:21:42 -0800 (PST)
- To: w3c-wai-hc@w3.org
Once upon a time Dave Raggett shaped the electrons to say... >My concern is that requiring browsers to insert quotation >marks around the contents of each <Q>...</Q> element will >strongly discourage authors from using this element.since I agree. I would not use <Q> then. Authors cannot afford to have a quote NOT be delimited from the rest of the text, and therefore need to include quotation marks in the text if older browsers are a concern. Unless browsers have intelligence and do not add a second series of quotes if there are already a set - and this is mandated - <Q> becomes unusable for those concerned with backwards compatibility. ie: <Q>quote</Q> - browser adds quotes <Q>"quote"</Q> - browser recognizes internal quotes, and does not add more. <Q>'quote'</Q> - browser recognizes internal quotes, and does not add more. This is a technological solution to the problem. A procedural solution would be that <Q> does not add quotations - ever. And the author must add their own. This is similar to the problem I have with TFOOT in TABLES - the only widely used browsers that handles it correctly is IE4. N4 will display TFOOT content before TBODY, as well all older browsers. And that means TFOOT is not usable for anyone concerned with browsers other than IE4. -MZ -- Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 1997 17:28:40 UTC