W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-hc@w3.org > October to December 1997

Re: WAI HC, IG accessibility review

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 16:54:26 -0500
Message-ID: <344E7612.3210@w3.org>
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
CC: w3c-html-wg@w3.org, w3c-wai-hc@w3.org
Al Gilman wrote:
> 
> Here is an overview of the results of the accessibility review of
> HTML4 and CSS2.  Please use the copy on the Web at
> 
>  http://www.w3.org/WAI/group/HC/report.html

Hmm... this isn't what I was expecting. I was expecting
a list of proposed changes, complete with suggested wording.

The examples are good, and maybe those are enough.
Editors: what do you think? Are these proposals clear
enough that you can just merge them in, or do you
see missing bits or open issues?

Each of the issues (option, table, desc, ref, media) seems
to have several proposals available. There are still questions
to discuss, etc.

We have just over a week to incorporate the WAI input on HTML4.
I don't expect the HTML WG to debate the various proposals,
but rather to review and refine the suggested changes.

In particular, we need something that won't change, or won't
change that much. But I see:

=======
http://www.w3.org/WAI/group/HC/guide.html
This page will be maintained to try to keep it within 24 hours of
current with respect to current discussion during the period from
October 15th to Nov 10th. 
=======

Am I off the mark?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C HTML Working Group Chair
http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
phone://1/512/310-2971
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 1997 17:53:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:56:11 UTC