Re: input from experience

to follow up on what Dave Raggett said:
> > 
> > His idea for how to clearly indicate this header/row association
> > is to have attributes in the TABLE declaration (root) itself
> > saying which rows contain column heads and which columns contain
> > row heads.
> 
> This is too limited. It doesn't say how to deal with cases where a
> column contains both column and row headers. The scope proposal is
> more flexible in this respect and simple to support with the current
> desktop word processing software table editing paradigm.
> 

I agree.

I think that your "scope" proposal, give or take minor munges,
should go forward in our package of proposals.

-- Al