to follow up on what Dave Raggett said: > > > > His idea for how to clearly indicate this header/row association > > is to have attributes in the TABLE declaration (root) itself > > saying which rows contain column heads and which columns contain > > row heads. > > This is too limited. It doesn't say how to deal with cases where a > column contains both column and row headers. The scope proposal is > more flexible in this respect and simple to support with the current > desktop word processing software table editing paradigm. > I agree. I think that your "scope" proposal, give or take minor munges, should go forward in our package of proposals. -- AlReceived on Monday, 13 October 1997 11:02:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:35:00 UTC