- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 12:47:37 -0400 ()
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- cc: HC team <w3c-wai-hc@w3.org>
On Tue, 23 Sep 1997, Al Gilman wrote: > Dictionaries are not single-function and hence dictionary types > are not a partition. A hierarchical taxonomy would work to > characterize them, or a logical record type such as I discussed > earlier. ... Thanks. If we want to be able describe the features of a particular dictionary, then I tend to agree with Murray's suggestion of exploiting RDF. Regards, -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett phone: +44 122 578 2521 (office) +44 385 320 444 (gsm mobile) World Wide Web Consortium (on assignment from HP Labs)
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 1997 12:49:15 UTC