Re: AGWG: Please review proposal to close Silver issues round 2

+1

On 25 February 2025 at 20:10:50, Chuck Adams (charles.adams@oracle.com)
wrote:

Members of the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,



We are asking you to review and approve the closure of the following list
of silver issues, which can be found by using the following link:  Silver
Issues Ready To Close
<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/silver/issues?q=is*3Aissue*20state*3Aopen*20label*3A*22survey*20*3A*20ready*20for*22__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!ZmTOhK30xT1_qOSRwBzxsFs1JVXsw75EFzHmApEYoJnOfnRhJEUPpU3FLG3qCFiJs-UFt_cknRNKLotc9onpJA$>.
These are silver issues that I have reviewed since the prior time I have
asked for your approval.



These issues are four or more years old, and can be closed because either
the issue has been addressed in the current WCAG 3 draft or the issue has
become irrelevant due to changes of content in the WCAG 3 draft.



Every issue contains a proposed response explaining the reason for closing
the issue.  This explanation includes instructions on opening an issue in
WCAG 3 should anybody decide that a closed issue has not been
satisfactorily resolved.



We ask that you reply to this email with +1 in support of closing all these
issues, or that you identify the issues that you feel should remain open.
Any issues you feel should remain open will be transferred from the Silver
repository to the WCAG 3 repository for additional review.



Regards,

Charles Adams