Re: AGWG: Please review proposal to close Silver issues round 2

+1

On 25/02/2025 20:10, Chuck Adams wrote:
> Members of the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,
> 
> We are asking you to review and approve the closure of the following 
> list of silver issues, which can be found by using the following link: 
> Silver Issues Ready To Close <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ 
> github.com/w3c/silver/issues? 
> q=is*3Aissue*20state*3Aopen*20label*3A*22survey*20*3A*20ready*20for*22__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!ZmTOhK30xT1_qOSRwBzxsFs1JVXsw75EFzHmApEYoJnOfnRhJEUPpU3FLG3qCFiJs-UFt_cknRNKLotc9onpJA$>.  These are silver issues that I have reviewed since the prior time I have asked for your approval.
> 
> These issues are four or more years old, and can be closed because 
> either the issue has been addressed in the current WCAG 3 draft or the 
> issue has become irrelevant due to changes of content in the WCAG 3 draft.
> 
> Every issue contains a proposed response explaining the reason for 
> closing the issue.  This explanation includes instructions on opening an 
> issue in WCAG 3 should anybody decide that a closed issue has not been 
> satisfactorily resolved.
> 
> We ask that you reply to this email with +1 in support of closing all 
> these issues, or that you identify the issues that you feel should 
> remain open.  Any issues you feel should remain open will be transferred 
> from the Silver repository to the WCAG 3 repository for additional review.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Charles Adams
> 

-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

* https://www.splintered.co.uk/
* https://github.com/patrickhlauke
* https://flickr.com/photos/redux/
* https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke

Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2025 08:45:26 UTC