RE: CFC - WCAG 2.2 and 2.1 errata

+1

From: Alastair Campbell <alastair.campbell@thisisgain.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 7:12 AM
To: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - WCAG 2.2 and 2.1 errata

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


Call For Consensus - ends Thursday 26th June at midday Boston time.



There are several minor errata encompassed by this PR which updates the errata page:

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4370



The changes to the TR doc are listed and linked to in the description of that issue, and here:



  *   Switching the position of User Inactivity and User Interface to make them listed alphabetically #4256<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4256>
  *   Amend definition of motion animation to *not* exclude blurring #4040<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4040>
  *   link directly to new supplemental guidance #2296<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2296>
  *   Harmonise spelling for "breakpoint" #4165<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4165>



These updates have all been through the usual group-review process, this CFC is to agree to add these as errata. It is not a re-publication; they will only be listed on the errata pages until there is a re-publication of WCAG 2.1/2.2.



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you not being able to accept this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

alastairc.uk<https://alastairc.uk/> / www.thisisgain.com<http://www.nomensa.com/>