Re: CFC - WCAG 2.2 and 2.1 errata

+1

Thanks,
Tiffany Burtin
________________________________
From: Alastair Campbell <alastair.campbell@thisisgain.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2025 6:12 AM
To: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - WCAG 2.2 and 2.1 errata


Call For Consensus — ends Thursda= 26th June at midday Boston time.



There are several minor errata encompass=d by this PR which updates the errata page:

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4370<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/p=ll/4370>=/p>



The changes to the TR doc are listed and linked to i= the description of that issue, and here:



  *   Swit=hing the position of User Inactivity and User Interface to make them liste= alphabetically #4256<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4256>
  *   Amend definiti=n of motion animation to *not* exclude blurring #4040<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4040>
  *   link directly=o new supplemental guidance #2296<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2296>
  *   Harmonise spe=ling for "breakpoint" #4165<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4165>



These updates have all been through the =sual group-review process, this CFC is to agree to add these as errata. It=s not a re-publication; they will only be listed on the errata pages until there is a re-publication of WCAG 2.1/2.2.<=o:p>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus posi=ion that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns resu=t in you not being able to accept this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.



Kind regar=s,

 =/span>

-Alastair<=span>

 =/span>

--

 =/span>

alastairc.uk<https://alastairc.uk/> / www.thisisgain.com<http://www.nomensa.com/=%20target=>