Re: [EXT] Re: CFC - Publication of ACT Rules format 1.1

+1

On Mon 10 Jun 2024 at 17:20, Julie Romanowski <julie@knowbility.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:13 AM Droege, Catherine A. (TR Product) <
> catherine.droege@thomsonreuters.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Monday, June 10, 2024 10:42 AM
>> *To:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> *Subject:* [EXT] Re: CFC - Publication of ACT Rules format 1.1
>>
>>
>>
>> *External Email:* Use caution with links and attachments.
>>
>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>> Todd Libby
>>
>> toddlibby@protonmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, June 6th, 2024 at 4:36 AM, Alastair Campbell <
>> acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:
>>
>> Call For Consensus — ends 12th June at mid-day Boston time.
>>
>>
>>
>> The ACT task force would like to publish version 1.1 of the ACT Rules
>> format:
>>
>> https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!deW9QxOd_34hqStTsR0Z4Ywr0Yo_tBXfpHjof-vB9lQodrnfJHaTo11yFWy0CJMMqd1HEHM_5MYAW7CBx8-OsJJsXFmpzqaG$>
>>
>>
>>
>> The specific changes are detailed in this github issue:
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3616
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3616__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!deW9QxOd_34hqStTsR0Z4Ywr0Yo_tBXfpHjof-vB9lQodrnfJHaTo11yFWy0CJMMqd1HEHM_5MYAW7CBx8-OsJJsXElM8_Sw$>
>>
>>
>>
>> A ‘diff’ version comparing it to version 1.0 is also available:
>>
>>
>> https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://www.w3.org/TR/act-rules-format/&doc2=https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https:**Awww.w3.org*TR*act-rules-format*&doc2=https:**Aw3c.github.io*wcag-act*act-rules-format.html__;Ly8vLy8vLy8v!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!deW9QxOd_34hqStTsR0Z4Ywr0Yo_tBXfpHjof-vB9lQodrnfJHaTo11yFWy0CJMMqd1HEHM_5MYAW7CBx8-OsJJsXKpZwxrc$>
>>
>>
>>
>> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
>> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
>> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
>> the CfC deadline.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you support the publication, then a reply with “+1” is useful (but not
>> required).
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> -Alastair
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.nomensa.com/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!deW9QxOd_34hqStTsR0Z4Ywr0Yo_tBXfpHjof-vB9lQodrnfJHaTo11yFWy0CJMMqd1HEHM_5MYAW7CBx8-OsJJsXEfQmq7f$>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Monday, 10 June 2024 16:21:33 UTC