Re: [EXT] Re: CFC - Publication of ACT Rules format 1.1

+1

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:13 AM Droege, Catherine A. (TR Product) <
catherine.droege@thomsonreuters.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, June 10, 2024 10:42 AM
> *To:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* [EXT] Re: CFC - Publication of ACT Rules format 1.1
>
>
>
> *External Email:* Use caution with links and attachments.
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Todd Libby
>
> toddlibby@protonmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 6th, 2024 at 4:36 AM, Alastair Campbell <
> acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:
>
> Call For Consensus — ends 12th June at mid-day Boston time.
>
>
>
> The ACT task force would like to publish version 1.1 of the ACT Rules
> format:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!deW9QxOd_34hqStTsR0Z4Ywr0Yo_tBXfpHjof-vB9lQodrnfJHaTo11yFWy0CJMMqd1HEHM_5MYAW7CBx8-OsJJsXFmpzqaG$>
>
>
>
> The specific changes are detailed in this github issue:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3616
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3616__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!deW9QxOd_34hqStTsR0Z4Ywr0Yo_tBXfpHjof-vB9lQodrnfJHaTo11yFWy0CJMMqd1HEHM_5MYAW7CBx8-OsJJsXElM8_Sw$>
>
>
>
> A ‘diff’ version comparing it to version 1.0 is also available:
>
>
> https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://www.w3.org/TR/act-rules-format/&doc2=https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https:**Awww.w3.org*TR*act-rules-format*&doc2=https:**Aw3c.github.io*wcag-act*act-rules-format.html__;Ly8vLy8vLy8v!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!deW9QxOd_34hqStTsR0Z4Ywr0Yo_tBXfpHjof-vB9lQodrnfJHaTo11yFWy0CJMMqd1HEHM_5MYAW7CBx8-OsJJsXKpZwxrc$>
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> If you support the publication, then a reply with “+1” is useful (but not
> required).
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.nomensa.com/__;!!GFN0sa3rsbfR8OLyAw!deW9QxOd_34hqStTsR0Z4Ywr0Yo_tBXfpHjof-vB9lQodrnfJHaTo11yFWy0CJMMqd1HEHM_5MYAW7CBx8-OsJJsXEfQmq7f$>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>