- From: Shawn Thompson <shawn@shawnthompson.ca>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:39:21 -0400
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <8ED98BDB-7C02-4449-8383-8343672081B8@shawnthompson.ca>
Let’s not forget language of text. Some assistive technology is already doing this. My text to speech does not even respect the `lang` attributes. **Shawn Thompson, WAS** Web Accessibility Technical Advisor | Conseiller technique en accessibilité Web Montreal, Quebec (613) 363-7468 shawn@shawnthompson.ca On 4 Apr 2024, at 8:08, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > On 04/04/2024 08:02, Gregg Vanderheiden RTF wrote: >> >> >> I think much of our work is not forward-looking. >> >> We will soon have AI that can do a better job of text alternatives >> than humans can for example. >> And then it is unclear why we would require authors to do all this >> work. >> This applies to a LOT of things. > > As a counterpoint, Gregg ... when does it end? You've stated similar > when it comes to things like authors needing to provide correct > explicit markup for headings, since (to paraphrase) "AI will be able > to do it". > > Captions, audio descriptions ... "AI will be able to do it". > > Colour contrast issues? "AI can detect it and change it on the fly". > > Once you bring in the "AI will do it" line of thinking, we may as well > just remove any author requirement, and WCAG becomes just a list of > requirements for AI user agents to massage any old web content into > something accessible. > > P > -- > Patrick H. Lauke > > * https://www.splintered.co.uk/ > * https://github.com/patrickhlauke > * https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ > * https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2024 12:39:38 UTC