Re: Target size Pre-CFC

Right, that’s true, so if we say:

You must do A, B, C, <at risk>and D</at risk>. Then we could wind up with:

You must do A, B, C, and D.
You must do A, B, and C.

Even with that, I think that people should consider whether the changes discussed are more important than staying the course with the current CR.

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Director, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk



From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 5:24 PM
To: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L" <rmontgomery@loc.gov>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Target size Pre-CFC


EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.


> If we republish to CR with the Target Size SC at Risk we still won’t be able to make substantive changes to that text in the next CR, we will only have the new option of removing that SC from WCAG 2.2 entirely.

From discussion with Michael, you don’t have to drop an SC if you specify in advance what the alternative is (which we learned from last time!)

E.g. the ‘new feature’ to drop would be the changed text, and we revert back to the previous one, if specified in advance.

Kind regards,

-Alastair