Re: Target size Pre-CFC

+1 to the approach of 1) updating the text to  remove “lists” and  update spacing, 2) marking at risk, and 3) specifying that if we do not get positive response, we fallback to currently published

Mike

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 at 11:40 AM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Target size Pre-CFC
Hi everyone, We discussed updates to Target size today based on the previous survey, PR, and discussion. Those were captured in this google doc: https: //docs. google. com/document/d/1N38qrHOJSXW-OrJI7GiSjQwaYZxh5OBDJ36No7p2Ax4/edit# And implemented
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Hi everyone,

We discussed updates to Target size today based on the previous survey, PR, and discussion.

Those were captured in this google doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N38qrHOJSXW-OrJI7GiSjQwaYZxh5OBDJ36No7p2Ax4/edit#<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N38qrHOJSXW-OrJI7GiSjQwaYZxh5OBDJ36No7p2Ax4/edit#>

And implemented in this PR:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3123/files#diff-a30d6476d02e45a066c55e8e174fe5381088cb0a3862e9c2e4eb3bbdf695c007<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3123/files#diff-a30d6476d02e45a066c55e8e174fe5381088cb0a3862e9c2e4eb3bbdf695c007>

Specifically:

  *   Remove the ‘lists’ from the inline exemption.
  *   Update the spacing exception to use the ‘circles’ method.

The plan discussed in the meeting was to put this SC “at risk”, with the proposed text being our preference, but if problems are found with that during review, we fall-back to the current SC text.

This email is to check for objections before we go to CFC. So, any objections to that approach & content?

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>