- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 11:55:27 +0000
- To: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 24 March 2023 11:56:26 UTC
Hi Dan, > I am in favor of strengthening the requirements at AAA per the presented research, but could live with moving to AAA as is. If we do strengthen it, Either requires re-entering CR, so we might as well go with the best version we can. I’ve put together a proposal doc for discussion on Tuesday: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RGQBMvDAhEylflppCAKrF6IW8zjHjqH6DNqXKKzpHyI/edit# The language gets quite tricky if we say “twice the size”, e.g. “is at least twice as large as the area of a 1 CSS pixel<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#dfn-css-pixels> thick perimeter<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#dfn-perimeter> of the unfocused component or sub-component” I read that and think, “why isn’t it just 2 CSS pixels”? Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Friday, 24 March 2023 11:56:26 UTC