Hi Matt, Mark, Katie, Matt wrote: > What impact will this change have if you’re required to follow the ISO version of 2.0? Will it be updated, as well, or will this fork the standards? My understanding is that if you follow the current ISO version then it will be as it is now, but there is an effort to provide an updated version to ISO based on 2.2. Mark asked: > Is it an errata? We would implement it as an errata, then it would go for public review before we can re-publish WCAG 2.0/2.1 with the erratas included. (All of them, not just this one.) Katie, could you specify why you went with -1? Pointing to someone else’s response is a reasonable way of doing that, it just helps us assess the reasoning people are using. Kind regards, -Alastair -- @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2023 10:54:40 UTC