Re: CFC - Target Size (Min) Updates

0 - I will echo Patrick L from another thread, why modify "lists" with
"bulleted or numbered"? If you are giving an exception to bulleted or
numbered lists, removing the bullets doesn't change the impact on the user.
Why not just "lists"?

With exceptions for so many things (almost any text link in the body of a
page; color pickers; sliders; un-resized: selects, radio buttons,
checkboxes, text fields, etc...) that it might be easier to flip it all and
say what IS in scope. We seem to be left with: buttons, tabs, and accordion
(toggle) controls anywhere on the page and any UICs in <nav> type areas.

*Melanie Philipp, CPACC, WAS | *Director, Services Methodology
| 540-848-5220
Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good
www.deque.com



On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 5:39 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> I’d like to prompt people to +1 (or otherwise) this CFC, with an update.
>
>
>
> To tackle one of the objections to the CFC, the inline exception has been
> updated to include bulleted or numbered lists:
>
> *“Inline:* The target is in a sentence, or is in a bulleted or numbered
> list, or its size is otherwise constrained by the line-height of non-target
> text;”
>
>
>
> That update is in PR #2856 linked below.
>
>
>
> I’ve checked in with the 3 people that had voted on this CFC already, and
> it did not affect their vote.
>
>
>
> More responses are welcome…
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Alastair Campbell
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday January 12th at 1pm Boston time.
>
>
>
> There are two proposed updates to the exceptions in Target Size (Minimum):
>
>
>
>    1. Inline exception:
>    https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2856/files
>    <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F2856%2Ffiles&data=05%7C01%7Cacampbell%40nomensa.com%7C38a787cae7f1417d19bd08daef1316e2%7Cebea4ad6fbbf43bd8449c56e26692c35%7C0%7C0%7C638085162529326800%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=E6Gwtmwxx2UdAIHyXcH4For2lulPzi%2BChvMvJaAW18g%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>    2. Target offset (including the definition):
>    https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2798/files
>    <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fpull%2F2798%2Ffiles&data=05%7C01%7Cacampbell%40nomensa.com%7C38a787cae7f1417d19bd08daef1316e2%7Cebea4ad6fbbf43bd8449c56e26692c35%7C0%7C0%7C638085162529326800%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=wmao2uSDhSo25ay8EB%2B5luNmnNmY6kxn6%2FlSQB5MXWI%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> These were discussed here:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2022/12/06-ag-minutes#t02
>
> And:
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2022OctDec/0178.html
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0008.html
>
> And surveyed (although subsequently updated):
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq10
>
>
>
> If excepted, we can raise an errata to align the inline exception in
> Target Size (Enhanced).
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>