- From: Chaals Nevile <charles.nevile@consensys.net>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2023 13:19:21 +0000
- To: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1673010651611.1699121608.1373459413@consensys.net>
On Friday, 6 January 2023 14:06:16 (+01:00), Wilco Fiers wrote: We promised WCAG 2.2 would be backward compatible. What I'm hearing you say is that with the current decisions, it won't be. This is, by far, the best reason NOT to remove 4.1.1 from WCAG 2.2 - and I would not object to a group decision keeping the requirement in, noting that it is explicitly to ensure that conformant WCAG 2.2 documents are conformant to WCAG 2.1 and 2.0, rather than because it still serves a known purpose directly. However, doing this would push the question of what to do with a requirement that has no benefit onto implementors, and it would be reasonable for many of them to say "it's important to almost-meet WCAG 2.2, but don't worry about 4.1.1". Such an approach would legitimately call into question the quality of our current work. I think that's a worse outcome than deciding we're not going to maintain compatibility after all for a decade-old requirement, since the world has actually changed. So I am changing my vote on the CfC slightly. I still think endorse removing the requirement to meet 4.1.1, but I think the text should explain more clearly what it was, and that it is required if people want to conform to 2.0/2.1. cheers Chaals -- Charles 'Chaals' Nevile Lead Standards Architect, ConsenSys Inc
Received on Friday, 6 January 2023 13:19:35 UTC