Re: Target size updates

They were both in the same email so I thought they were both the current draft.

Question:
If we limit it to sentences or multiple sentences, then how do we deal with bullet lists and menus and anyplace else where there is text but not full sentences. 




> On Dec 19, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:
> 
> “constrained by” does not mean a link has to be the maximum size of the line-height, it means that the line-height has to be less than 24px. 
> I.e. an 8px high link (such as a superscript text-link) is excepted if the line height is under 24px. it doesn’t have to be the height of the line-height.
> GV: Is there also a note to this effect?   This is good but not clear from SC without a note
> 
> AC: I think the logic of it is clear, as it is an exception to the initial SC text, I’d hope that a couple of examples in the understanding would do the job.
>  
>  
> GV: the full text in   #2798 says    "The target is in a sentence or block of text;"    ( This is good)  Do we define "block of text"?
>  
> I think that might be a miss-read (that PR is for the target offset), the new text <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2856/files> for the inline exception does not include “block of text”.
>  
> Also, the definition of “block of text” <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#dfn-blocks-of-text> is “more than one sentence of text”, so the current wording for 2.5.5 is effectively: The target is in a sentence, or more than one sentence of text”. That’s why I think the new wording would be better for both SCs.
>  
> -Alastair