- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:29:30 +0000
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@vanderheiden.us>
- CC: "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 19 December 2022 23:30:11 UTC
* “constrained by” does not mean a link has to be the maximum size of the line-height, it means that the line-height has to be less than 24px. I.e. an 8px high link (such as a superscript text-link) is excepted if the line height is under 24px. it doesn’t have to be the height of the line-height. GV: Is there also a note to this effect? This is good but not clear from SC without a note AC: I think the logic of it is clear, as it is an exception to the initial SC text, I’d hope that a couple of examples in the understanding would do the job. GV: the full text in #2798 says "The target is in a sentence or block of text;" ( This is good) Do we define "block of text"? I think that might be a miss-read (that PR is for the target offset), the new text<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2856/files> for the inline exception does not include “block of text”. Also, the definition of “block of text”<https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#dfn-blocks-of-text> is “more than one sentence of text”, so the current wording for 2.5.5 is effectively: The target is in a sentence, or more than one sentence of text”. That’s why I think the new wording would be better for both SCs. -Alastair
Received on Monday, 19 December 2022 23:30:11 UTC