- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 11:16:24 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 04/08/2022 11:09, Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > I'll just mention that the idea of having corrections in a separate > errata (while leaving the original text as is) is supremely antiquated > and not very useful for a standard - expecting developers to look not > just at the word of the standard, but then having to jump to the errata > to check that what they just read is actually correct? To be clear, I understand it for a standard that has been published and is supposed to be stable. But as we're now talking about a new edition, it makes more sense to me to actually correct things where needed (but yes, list the change in a "differences from 2.1" section). P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2022 10:16:38 UTC