- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 11:09:40 +0100
- To: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>, Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com>
- Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On 04/08/2022 11:07, Wilco Fiers wrote: > -1 > > If such changes are necessary I think they belong in an errata. We > shouldn't introduce them through a dot-release. I'll just mention that the idea of having corrections in a separate errata (while leaving the original text as is) is supremely antiquated and not very useful for a standard - expecting developers to look not just at the word of the standard, but then having to jump to the errata to check that what they just read is actually correct? P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2022 10:09:55 UTC