Re: Getting mild normative changes in before 2.2 is finalised

On 04/08/2022 11:07, Wilco Fiers wrote:
> -1
> If such changes are necessary I think they belong in an errata. We 
> shouldn't introduce them through a dot-release.

I'll just mention that the idea of having corrections in a separate 
errata (while leaving the original text as is) is supremely antiquated 
and not very useful for a standard - expecting developers to look not 
just at the word of the standard, but then having to jump to the errata 
to check that what they just read is actually correct?

Patrick H. Lauke | |
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Thursday, 4 August 2022 10:09:55 UTC