Re: Getting mild normative changes in before 2.2 is finalised

On 04/08/2022 11:07, Wilco Fiers wrote:
> -1
> 
> If such changes are necessary I think they belong in an errata. We 
> shouldn't introduce them through a dot-release.

I'll just mention that the idea of having corrections in a separate 
errata (while leaving the original text as is) is supremely antiquated 
and not very useful for a standard - expecting developers to look not 
just at the word of the standard, but then having to jump to the errata 
to check that what they just read is actually correct?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke