Re: CFC Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation (Revised)

Hello,

The changes Gregg has proposed are not normative. If the group agrees to incorporate the changes in WCAG 2.2, they can be addressed one of several ways:
·       An update to the existing CfC with an extended response date,
·       Accepting the current CfC and moving to Candidate Recommendation, followed by another CfC for CR that includes these changes, or
·       An errata.

Since this is a substantive change to an existing SC that has come in last minute but has support for discussion, we will discuss them at next Tuesday’s meeting.

We will send out a survey later today with the proposed changes and options for incorporating them if approved.

Please continue reviewing the CFC for CR.  We appreciate you letting us know of any additional typos you find so we can correct them. You can respond to the CR before Tuesday but you have several days after the meeting to do so as well. We will revise the CR if needed based on the group’s decision on Tuesday.

Kind regards,

AG Chairs


From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gregg@vanderheiden.us>
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 11:40 AM
To: "w3c-waI-gl@w3. org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: CFC Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation (Revised)
Resent-From: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 11:37 AM

-1 to CFC for CR

I sent some suggested changes to  NOTES in the  Flash (seizure) provision definitions of WCAG to clarify how these SC would apply to new screen resolutions and color spaces.

These are NOT normative changes - only text added to notes or added notes to the definitions of the terms used in the SC.    The current notes are out of date - and the changes would bring the text up to date before we freeze 2.2  which is likely to be around for awhile

I sent a note to the Chairs last week asking asking them how to proceed. They haven’t had a chance to get back to me yet - but I presume these notes changes should be done before CR.

Sorry to not get them in earlier but it was complicated and Bern and I have been trying to figure out how to do this (and what we could do) without making any normative changes —    and I didn’t know the CR call would come so fast.

I have attached the proposed edits as tracked changes in the Word document attached.

Thanks

Gregg Vanderheiden
gregg@vanderheiden.us<mailto:gregg@vanderheiden.us>



On Aug 2, 2022, at 7:15 AM, Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com<mailto:michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>> wrote:

Thank you,
+1


From: Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael <rmontgomery@loc.gov<mailto:rmontgomery@loc.gov>>
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 7:13 AM
To: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com<mailto:michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: CFC Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation (Revised)
Mike, The difference is that the AAA version has no exception. The CFC for that text is at https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2022AprJun/0183.html Kind regards, Rachael ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.



ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Mike,

The difference is that the AAA version has no exception. The CFC for that text is athttps://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2022AprJun/0183.html


Kind regards,

Rachael

From: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com<mailto:michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>>
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:10 AM
To: "Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael" <rmontgomery@loc.gov<mailto:rmontgomery@loc.gov>>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: CFC Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation (Revised)
Resent-From: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:09 AM

3.3.7 and 3.3.8 seem to have identical normative text?

Mike


From: Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael <rmontgomery@loc.gov<mailto:rmontgomery@loc.gov>>
Date: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 7:03 AM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: CFC Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation (Revised)
My apologies, I used the incorrect URI. Please review https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/ The revised CFC is below. Call for Consensus – ends Thursday August 11th at 23:59pm Boston time. ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.



ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
My apologies, I used the incorrect URI. Please review https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/


The revised CFC is below.

Call for Consensus – ends Thursday August 11th at 23:59pm Boston time.
The Working Group has approved CFCs for all new normative content in WCAG 2.2 and it is ready to move to Candidate Recommendation.
The draft is at https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CFC deadline.