Re: [External] Re: [Protocols] Minutes for March 4th, 2022

Hi Jake,

Did you see/read Rachael’s presentation on the protocols/assertions next steps?
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1b5xHQWBzoYdKp7BfPgIUBCpz-yaDOx_kSq_HlQxcFh0/edit#slide=id.g115ec01aa81_0_39

I think we’re saying similar things, so to transpose your buckets onto the proposal:


Constant
Condition
Test Case
Protocol
Smallest Unit
Bucket 1
 1
2
2
View
 1
 1
2
2
User Process
 1
 1
 2
2
Aggregate
 1
 1
 2
2

I have been assuming that requirements for the organisation (bucket 3) would be covered in the maturity model work, which could be incorporated into WCAG3 in future, but that is a future decision.

I think there is also alignment between what John called “Vetted and approved” and the Test Case, and “Internal or Company-Authored” and Protocol.

I don’t want to get hung up on the terms, we can work on that, I just wanted to separate the organisational level aspects from the requirements for the product/thing/website.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>