Re: CFC - Errata for WCAG 2.1 accessibility supported definition

+1

Francis

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 09:33
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - Errata for WCAG 2.1 accessibility supported definition

Call For Consensus — ends Monday January 10th at mid-day Boston time.



The Working Group has discussed a small change to a note on a definition:

https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#h-note-43



Whilst it is a small change, it is normative therefore we are going through the CFC process.



It was raised in this issue:

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1758



Discussed and agreed in this meeting:

https://www.w3.org/2022/01/04-ag-minutes.html#t06



The specific changes are detailed in this pull request:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1777/files



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>