RE: CFC - Errata for WCAG 2.1 accessibility supported definition

+1

Chuck

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 10:32 AM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [External] : CFC - Errata for WCAG 2.1 accessibility supported definition


Call For Consensus - ends Monday January 10th at mid-day Boston time.



The Working Group has discussed a small change to a note on a definition:

https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#h-note-43<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/*h-note-43__;Iw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!eqIm5aT6rnZFDfZm1NT9v65renCAmbjFnNvjwsS7kyqvUOgvtrczOqVUy1WnybYoiw$>



Whilst it is a small change, it is normative therefore we are going through the CFC process.



It was raised in this issue:

https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1758<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1758__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!eqIm5aT6rnZFDfZm1NT9v65renCAmbjFnNvjwsS7kyqvUOgvtrczOqVUy1WUfQx1YQ$>



Discussed and agreed in this meeting:

https://www.w3.org/2022/01/04-ag-minutes.html#t06<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2022/01/04-ag-minutes.html*t06__;Iw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!eqIm5aT6rnZFDfZm1NT9v65renCAmbjFnNvjwsS7kyqvUOgvtrczOqVUy1VPASmOSw$>



The specific changes are detailed in this pull request:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1777/files<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1777/files__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!eqIm5aT6rnZFDfZm1NT9v65renCAmbjFnNvjwsS7kyqvUOgvtrczOqVUy1XCzxmcCw$>



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to live with" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.nomensa.com__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!eqIm5aT6rnZFDfZm1NT9v65renCAmbjFnNvjwsS7kyqvUOgvtrczOqVUy1WvDx0i2Q$>