Re: CFC - WCAG 2.2 Target Size (Min), Normative Text

+1

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022, 2:37 PM Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> ---
> Best,
>
> Todd
>
> ------- Original Message -------
> On Wednesday, June 29th, 2022 at 9:46 AM, Alastair Campbell <
> acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Wednesday Monday July 4th at midday Boston time.
>
>
>
> The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC *Target Size
> (Min) *and the *Normative text *needs to be approved by CFC.
>
>
>
> It can be previewed in the editor’s draft:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#target-size-minimum
>
>
>
> The SC was last discussed in a meeting May 17th:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2022/05/17-ag-minutes#item07
>
>
>
> The change history is here:
>
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/target-size-minimum.html
>
>
>
> The survey is available here:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-target-size-min/results
>
>
>
> The github issues are listed here:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%222.5.8+Target+Size+%28Min%29%22+-label%3A%22Survey+-+Added%22
>
> (There is 1 open, related to an understanding content update.)
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Alastair
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>
>
>