- From: Melanie Philipp <melanie.philipp@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:49:45 -0400
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFfV1N6JoZjVnMwOhxCyDy0WgnApMzq6J1wG52Py5bfXKRh2+g@mail.gmail.com>
+1 *Melanie Philipp, CPACC, WAS | *Director, Services Methodology | 540-848-5220 Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good www.deque.com On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 11:21 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Call For Consensus — ends Friday June 10th at midday Boston time. > > > > The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC Redundant Entry > and it needs to be approved by CFC. > > > > It can be previewed in the editor’s draft: > > https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/redundant-entry.html > > > > The SC was last discussed Dec 3rd: > > https://www.w3.org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes#t24 > > > > The change history is here: > > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/redundant-entry.html > > > > The surveys are available here: > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry/results and > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry-updates/results > > > > The github issues (all closed) are listed here: > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3A%223.3.8+Redundant+Entry%22+ > > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2022 14:50:10 UTC