- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 16:59:33 +0000
- To: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <PR3PR09MB5347AF496ECF9C37C936B977B9A29@PR3PR09MB5347.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Michael, > I believe a prior version had a note (or even normative wording) explaining that the process is constrained to the current user session. That was removed last august: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commit/45f7815e0cb484540e6d362244c35acea89e7bd3 > I also thought the search results example had been critiqued and decided to be removed? We can check that, but the CFC is for the normative text. Understanding doc updates can be done separately. > Finally, shouldn’t the 2 editor’s notes beginning “Are there…” be removed before CFC? All the “editor’s notes” will be removed prior to CR, but shouldn’t impact this CFC. Kind regards, -Alastair From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> Date: Monday, June 6, 2022 at 8:20 AM To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] CFC - WCAG 2.2 Redundant entry Call For Consensus — ends Friday June 10th at midday Boston time. The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC Redundant Entry and it needs to be approved by CFC. It can be previewed in the editor’s draft: ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Call For Consensus — ends Friday June 10th at midday Boston time. The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC Redundant Entry and it needs to be approved by CFC. It can be previewed in the editor’s draft: https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/redundant-entry.html<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwcag%2Funderstanding%2Fredundant-entry.html&data=05%7C01%7Cacampbell%40nomensa.com%7C44120b34848142cca16b08da47dace2c%7Cebea4ad6fbbf43bd8449c56e26692c35%7C0%7C0%7C637901302330585015%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4bfTbcNio6Q3SeRl0V%2FkSGvw3xua%2B%2Bmw%2F2MafaJOzjA%3D&reserved=0> The SC was last discussed Dec 3rd: https://www.w3.org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes#t24 The change history is here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/redundant-entry.html<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fcommits%2Fmain%2Fguidelines%2Fsc%2F22%2Fredundant-entry.html&data=05%7C01%7Cacampbell%40nomensa.com%7C44120b34848142cca16b08da47dace2c%7Cebea4ad6fbbf43bd8449c56e26692c35%7C0%7C0%7C637901302330585015%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jMqdjww97hy1oWtcDcdTf3tC5I0vBFBOwrDWE2cTT8E%3D&reserved=0> The surveys are available here: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry/results and https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry-updates/results The github issues (all closed) are listed here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3A%223.3.8+Redundant+Entry%22<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2Fissues%3Fq%3Dis%253Aissue%2Blabel%253A%25223.3.8%2BRedundant%2BEntry%2522&data=05%7C01%7Cacampbell%40nomensa.com%7C44120b34848142cca16b08da47dace2c%7Cebea4ad6fbbf43bd8449c56e26692c35%7C0%7C0%7C637901302330585015%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JT9pnNiJGZrODiRzcrVvAFJU02ujL5YhObd%2B3ltXnjo%3D&reserved=0>+ If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. Kind regards, -Alastair -- @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>
Received on Monday, 6 June 2022 16:59:49 UTC