- From: Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 16:37:06 +0000
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SA0PR15MB40320D500CFDD3891D63ACEADEA29@SA0PR15MB4032.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
I believe a prior version had a note (or even normative wording) explaining that the process is constrained to the current user session. I see such wording in the Understanding document. If prior discussion led to this being considered adequate, that’s fine. I also thought the search results example had been critiqued and decided to be removed? Again, if my recollection is incorrect, and the outcome was to keep, that’s fine. Finally, shouldn’t the 2 editor’s notes beginning “Are there…” be removed before CFC? Mike From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> Date: Monday, June 6, 2022 at 8:20 AM To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] CFC - WCAG 2.2 Redundant entry Call For Consensus — ends Friday June 10th at midday Boston time. The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC Redundant Entry and it needs to be approved by CFC. It can be previewed in the editor’s draft: ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ˛ ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Call For Consensus — ends Friday June 10th at midday Boston time. The Working Group has previously discussed the WCAG 2.2 SC Redundant Entry and it needs to be approved by CFC. It can be previewed in the editor’s draft: https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/redundant-entry.html<https://w3c.github.io/wcag/understanding/redundant-entry.html> The SC was last discussed Dec 3rd: https://www.w3.org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes#t24<https://www.w3.org/2021/12/03-ag-minutes#t24> The change history is here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/redundant-entry.html<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/commits/main/guidelines/sc/22/redundant-entry.html> The surveys are available here: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry/results<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry/results> and https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry-updates/results<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-redundant-entry-updates/results> The github issues (all closed) are listed here: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3A%223.3.8+Redundant+Entry%22<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3A%223.3.8+Redundant+Entry%22>+ If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. Kind regards, -Alastair -- @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>
Received on Monday, 6 June 2022 16:37:25 UTC