W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2022

Re: [EXT] Re: Visible controls - Design canvas exception

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:35:47 +0000
To: Jennifer Strickland <jstrickland@mitre.org>, Sarah Horton <sarah.horton@gmail.com>, Michael Gower <michael.gower@ca.ibm.com>
CC: WCAG list <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <PR3PR09MB53473E4B628D09BBE05D6D8BB9ED9@PR3PR09MB5347.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>

> for each interactive thing I make, I need to provide another indicator of interactivity.

But what counts as an indicator?

There were quite a few examples where the thing itself is thought to be sufficient, otherwise we are asking for icons on everything.

That is the ambiguity we haven't cracked.

Alastair

Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2022 13:36:01 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sarah Horton: "Re: [EXT] Visible controls - Design canvas exception"
Previous message: Jennifer Strickland: "Re: [EXT] Re: Visible controls - Design canvas exception"
In reply to: Jennifer Strickland: "Re: [EXT] Re: Visible controls - Design canvas exception"
Next in thread: Sarah Horton: "Re: [EXT] Visible controls - Design canvas exception"
Reply: Sarah Horton: "Re: [EXT] Visible controls - Design canvas exception"
Reply: Jennifer Strickland: "Re: [EXT] Re: Visible controls - Design canvas exception"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 12 April 2022 13:36:03 UTC