Re: Target Size (Min)

On 18/03/2021 10:52, Alastair Campbell wrote:

> I don't think people will read into the SC text anything about it being big enough to hit vs spaced enough not to miss. That will come from the top paragraph of the intent, which conveys that pretty well:
> "The intent of this Success Criterion is to ensure targets can easily be activated without accidentally activating an adjacent target. [...]"

Even that first sentence states the two things though "easily be 
activated" is not necessarily the same as "without accidentally 
activating adjacent targets". The SC, with the spacing exception, can 
certainly aim for the latter, but the latter doesn't guarantee the former.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Thursday, 18 March 2021 11:01:10 UTC