Re: Target Size (Min)

On 18/03/2021 10:16, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> I think the overall objective is targets with sufficient size (1), so it is reasonable to start the SC that way. It also follows the format of other SCs like 2.5.4 & 2.5.5.

They don't seem to have the same "bait & switch" quality that stating 
"we want to make sure people can confidently click/tap targets, so they 
need to be big enough ... oh, but actually, if they're not big, at least 
make sure they're spaced further apart so even though a user can't 
confidently click/tap it, at least they won't click/tap the wrong one".

Wording it from the get-go to say "we want to avoid users 
clicking/tapping the wrong one" would be clearer on the intent/actual 
end effect this SC will have.

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Thursday, 18 March 2021 10:37:28 UTC