- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:37:14 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-ID: <47f9637f-8ff3-8afd-b862-d7ee82a24a5c@splintered.co.uk>
On 18/03/2021 10:16, Alastair Campbell wrote: > I think the overall objective is targets with sufficient size (1), so it is reasonable to start the SC that way. It also follows the format of other SCs like 2.5.4 & 2.5.5. They don't seem to have the same "bait & switch" quality that stating "we want to make sure people can confidently click/tap targets, so they need to be big enough ... oh, but actually, if they're not big, at least make sure they're spaced further apart so even though a user can't confidently click/tap it, at least they won't click/tap the wrong one". Wording it from the get-go to say "we want to avoid users clicking/tapping the wrong one" would be clearer on the intent/actual end effect this SC will have. P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Attachments
- image/png attachment: target-size-minimum-current.png
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2021 10:37:28 UTC